The Fabian Society: CREEPING COMMUNISM
Posted On 19 Jan 2014
By : BritanniaNews
As
you probably well know the “Guardian” is the newspaper of the Fabian
Society, one of their best know columnists is Polly Toynbe, whose
grandfather and great uncle were founding members of the society. The
BBC, who admit that they have exclusively recruited their staff from the
Guardian newspaper for the last 45 years, are the mouthpiece of the
Fabian Society.
It
is perhaps therefore a moment to remind ourselves of exactly what this
Society stands for. Apologies for the occasional duplication that
occurs in this otherwise erudite piece.
The Fabian Society: CREEPING COMMUNISM
July 15, 2013
By Paul Preston
By Paul Preston
The
Fabian Society was founded on 4 January 1884 in London as an offshoot of
a society founded in 1883 called The Fellowship of the New Life.
Fellowship members included poets Edward Carpenter and John Davidson,
sexologist Havelock Ellis and the future Fabian secretary Edward R.
Pease. They wanted to transform society by setting an example of clean
simplified living for others to follow, but when some members also
wanted to become politically involved to aid society’s transformation,
it was decided that a separate society, the Fabian Society, also be set
up. All members were free to attend both societies. The Fabian Society
additionally advocated renewal of Western European Renaissance ideas and
their promulgation throughout the rest of the world.
The
Fellowship of the New Life was dissolved in 1899, but the Fabian Society
grew to become the pre-eminent academic society in the United Kingdom
in the Edwardian era, typified by the members of its vanguard
Coefficients club. Public meetings of the Society were for many years
held at Essex Hall, a popular location just off the Strand in central
London.
The Fabian Society, which favoured gradual change rather than revolutionary change, was named – at the suggestion of Frank Podmore – in honour of the Roman general Fabius Maximus (nicknamed “Cunctator”, meaning “the Delayer”). His Fabian strategy advocated tactics of harassment and attrition rather than head-on battles against the Carthaginian army under the renowned general Hannibal.
The Fabian Society, which favoured gradual change rather than revolutionary change, was named – at the suggestion of Frank Podmore – in honour of the Roman general Fabius Maximus (nicknamed “Cunctator”, meaning “the Delayer”). His Fabian strategy advocated tactics of harassment and attrition rather than head-on battles against the Carthaginian army under the renowned general Hannibal.
An explanatory note appearing on the title page of the group’s first pamphlet declared:
“For the right moment you must wait, as Fabius did most patiently, when warring against Hannibal, though many censured his delays; but when the time comes you must strike hard, as Fabius did, or your waiting will be in vain, and fruitless.”
“For the right moment you must wait, as Fabius did most patiently, when warring against Hannibal, though many censured his delays; but when the time comes you must strike hard, as Fabius did, or your waiting will be in vain, and fruitless.”
The Fabian Society, along with other Secret Societies, work together for the ‘Common Purpose’ of a New World Order…
We see this consistently, with denial and delay tactics used in
response to complaints by the people and the lies, omissions and twisted
truths that spin doctors play to the public in the mass media.
Creeping Communism.
The Fabians, whose logo until very recently was a Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing, are a breed of Communism
who believe in Collectivism (Communism) by stealth. Many of the
‘Globalists’ would belong to this scheming organisation. Some of the
more erudite members, of the wealthy and intellectual classes of
England, formed an organization to perpetuate the concept of
collectivism, but not exactly according to Marx. In 1884, it was called
the Fabian Society. The name is significant, because it was in honor of
Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus, the Roman general who, in the second
century B.C. kept General Hannibal at bay by wearing down his army with
delaying tactics, endless maneouvering, and avoiding
confrontation wherever possible. Unlike the Marxists, who were in a
hurry to come to power through direct confrontation with established
governments, the Fabians were willing to take their time, to come to
power without direct confrontation, working quietly and patiently from
inside the target governments. To emphasise this strategy, and to
separate themselves from the Marxists, their official shield portrayed
an image of a Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing. Those two images perfectly
summarise their strategy.
It
is now 1884 and we find ourselves in Surrey, England observing a small
group of these Fabians, sitting around a table in the stylish home of
two of their more prominent members, Sydney and Beatrice Webb. The Webbs would be known world-wide as the founders of the London School of Economics.
Their home eventually was donated to the Fabian Society and became its
official headquarters. Around the table are such well-known figures as
George Bernard Shaw, Arnold Toynbee,
H.G. Wells and numerous others of similar caliber. The Fabian Society
still exists, and many prominent people are members, not the least of
which is England’s Ex-Prime Minister, Tony Blair. H.G. Wells wrote a
book to serve as a guide showing how collectivism
can be embedded into society without arousing alarm or serious opposition. It was called the Open Conspiracy and the plan for his new world order was spelled out in minute detail. His fervor was intense. He said that the old religions of the world must give way to the new religion of collectivism. The new religion should be the state, he said, and the state should take charge of all human activity with, of course, elitists, such as himself, in control.
can be embedded into society without arousing alarm or serious opposition. It was called the Open Conspiracy and the plan for his new world order was spelled out in minute detail. His fervor was intense. He said that the old religions of the world must give way to the new religion of collectivism. The new religion should be the state, he said, and the state should take charge of all human activity with, of course, elitists, such as himself, in control.
On
the very first page he says: “This book states as plainly and clearly
as possible the essential ideas of my life, the perspective of my
world… This is my religion. Here are my directive aims and the criteria
of all I do.” When he said that collectivism was his religion, he was
serious.
Like many collectivists, he felt that traditional religion is a barrier
to the acceptance of state power. It is a competitor for man’s
loyalties. Collectivists see religion as a device by which the clerics
keep the downtrodden masses content by offering a vision of
something better in the next world. If your goal is to bring about
change, contentment is not what you want. You want discontentment That’s
why Marx called religion the opiate of the masses. It gets in the way
of revolutionary change. Wells said that collectivism should become the
new opiate, that it should become the vision for better things in the
next world. The new order must be built on the concept that individuals
are nothing compared to the long continuum of society, and that only by
serving society do we become connected to eternity (HG Wells The Open
Conspiracy 1928 p 7).
The
blueprint in The Open Conspiracy has been followed in both the UK and
the United States. As a result, today’s world is very close to the
vision of H.G. Wells. A worship of the god called society has become the new religion.
No matter what insult to our dignity or liberty, we are told it’s
necessary for the advancement of society, and that has become the basis
for contentment under the hardships of collectivism.
Unfolding right in front of our eyes today is the world of Big Brother
and Thought Control portrayed by George Orwell in his classic book 1984.
1984
was written over 60 years ago in 1948. It portrays a stunningly
accurate and frightening picture of where we are potentially heading as a
global society. Despite being released as fiction, and despite the
book’s title, it was almost certainly based on a vision of the future
that is planned, not for 1984, but for a few years later. The year 1984
was used symbolically and is significant to Orwell’s secret society
connection.
George
Orwell, (real name Eric Blair), was educated at Eton College, a well
known Illuminati education center – it has produced 19 British Prime
Ministers including David Cameron. While at Eton, Orwell was taught
French by Aldous Huxley, it was here they became lifelong friends.
Huxley, who was also the author of another interesting book, ‘Brave New
World’, introduced Orwell to the Fabian society.
The
Fabian society is a secret society at its core, although anyone can
join, like all of these societies there are many levels of initiation
(such as with the Freemasons), meaning the majority of people involved
in the organisation have no idea of the true agenda and carry out their
roles creating a front for the fraud at the heart of the organisation.
The Fabian Society has been instrumental in the global fascist agenda.
It was the force behind the creation of the Labour Party in Britain but
operates both officially and unofficially across the globe as I will
detail elsewhere.
The name Fabian is said to come from ‘Fabius’, the Roman general, Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus. Fabius employed carefully planned strategies to wear down his enemies over a long period of time avoiding battles that could prove decisive either way. And of course this is exactly how the global agenda has been planned out. What is more, the Fabian society has a wolf in sheep clothing for its logo (right), how appropriate, and its motto is “Remould it nearer to the heart’s desire”, also appropriate.
The
significance in the title of Orwell’s book is the fact that 1984 is the
centenary year of the Fabian society, perhaps just another tidy
coincidence but it is speculated that he became disillusioned with the
society and 1984 was written not as fiction but an expose of the
knowledge of the Fabian agenda. And that would then explain why the
Fabian Society reportedly controls the copyright of ’1984′ until at
least 2025, they control the rights to his estate and they own and have
sealed Orwell’s archives.
It
would also explain how Orwell could write a book in 1948 telling in
great detail how the mass population could be so easily controlled by
the relative few elite.
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen
Da ich kein Toleranz romantiker bin, erlaube ich mir Kommentare ohne Sinn und Verstand zu löschen.